Page 3 of 12

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 9:11 pm
by zeus
If you have the stats from the TAM servers and the InstaGib server, you could compile those and just rank everyone alternating down between the teams.

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:06 pm
by Cams
zeus wrote:If you have the stats from the TAM servers and the InstaGib server, you could compile those and just rank everyone alternating down between the teams.
Why not using this stats, or just "playing it by ear" on who could be head of the team (like they do on grouping soccer teams on the WC and Champions league), having no more than 1 or 2 of this top players on a single team.

We all know Hornet and Maestro are good DMers, but I more than once have eaten Alpha's, K's and Sweatrs' combos, and Im pretty sure Bittr and Toxic can do this without any problem. And I have faced Trigga on way too many occassions to not acknowledge he is up to that level.

No more than 2 of this player in the same team (if its only 4 teams) I'd say.

Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:57 pm
by Maestro
Im in toxic.
You guys really think I'm a good DMer huh? Well that makes me feel good too hehe. But I get my share of whuppings on spam vikings and the damntam tam server too though. And Alpha, you're pretty damn good at TAM I dunno what you're worried about!

-Maestro

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 8:02 am
by Zax_Gentoo_Box
I like the idea of captains choosing, even though I was usually picked around hte middle, the preps were always picked first. Then the preps were all on the same team and beat us into pulp. And when I got to be captain, they wouldn't be on my team. I gave up in PE after awhile. Anyway, we should wait until we have a good number divisible by 4, then pick x/4 captains, x being hte number of people. I can't describe it any better.

Stop calling yourself noobs, I've played noobs and no one here is noobs! We could all eat noobs for breakfast, though I prefer to think that we like to be nice to them, most of the time. Some are better than others, I'll even admit here that Hornet is better than me and the one time Maestro played he was better than me, I've seen DWs get pwned and DWs pwning, so lets dispense with the "I'll play even though I'm a noob" and go onto the confident "I'm in let's start the fraggin'!"

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 8:58 am
by KarnEvil9
Zax_Gentoo_Box wrote:Stop calling yourself noobs, I've played noobs and no one here is noobs! We could all eat noobs for breakfast, though I prefer to think that we like to be nice to them, most of the time.
It seems my little buddy has forgotten all about me! ROLF! If ya need another target count me in! I'll show ya nOOb! LOL

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:29 am
by kaeolian
Hey sounds gr8 ill say count me in but it all depends when the matches take place, if its all weekend stuff ill be there ! :cheers:

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:48 am
by DW_ToxicWaste
Ok, right now we have 9v9. I'm sure I could drum up more support on the DW side. SVAs, start cold calling!

Rich (TW)

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 3:46 pm
by DW_KarmaKat
I was asked last night if I was going to participate....I'd previously thought about it when this thread started and had basically ended up talking myself out of doing it...I don't think my skill level comes anywhere near you guy's abilities.

Then...I thought about it some more...and found myself saying "Well...DUH! It's supposed to be for FUN!!"

Can't promise a stellar score...but at the very least I can provide a diversion...while the opposition is nailing my hide to the wall, my team can flank 'em and get revenge! ;)

So...yes....I'm game! :flower:

KKat

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:26 am
by ThrodOff
Count me in (when i'm not working :idea: ). Like Karma said, at least i can give some diversion.

Throd

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 8:56 am
by kaeolian
Yey Karma id happily team up with you, im no great TAM player my self in reality I suck at UT but I do like to think that I have got a good skill when it comes to planning which is why I enjoy ONS.

SO beware who ever gets me on their team ill be about as helpful as a badger on speed...