Dog the bounty hunter.

Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:10 am

Very political selction of text there Bomzin :blackeye:

I think it all comes down to the fine print of the Law and your suggestion

Why don't we just have a influx of Bounty Hunters to Mexico to hunt down all the rapist , murders , imbezlers , theif's ect.. bring them all home and before our justice system . All for a good cause

thats a great idea... this whole world is suffering because of boundries stopping people crossing over because of what you speak or what religion you follow. Hell because of the country you were born in and the people that run it even tho you may not support their ideas....

A case by case basis. So you are going to make it ok to break international treaties , that will be reveiwed latter to see if it was ok . Are you planning on asking Mexican officials before hand , or just do it .

I would ask that the mexican officials are the ones who decide as it is their country who the criminals are hiding in. Once they say a certain person is deemed deportable then they can decide weather to let the US or any other country handle it and use their resources or use there own.

(p.s. hope ure not taking this an an argument Bomzin as im actualy really enjoying being able to have a debate with some one who is mature.)

Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:05 am

:laughing3: Aw man,...and I was just about to post too! :sad2: ROFLMFAO! :laughing8:

Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:14 pm

I would ask that the mexican officials are the ones who decide as it is their country who the criminals are hiding in. Once they say a certain person is deemed deportable then they can decide weather to let the US or any other country handle it and use their resources or use there own.

So you want to keep it like it is now , ask permission first , then go for it , once authorization is granted. So what dog did was wrong in that he did not follow protocal . Thus he must be punished.

I am really having a hard time following if you are for or against this law.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander. We do in no means allow mexican bounty hunter to collect their bounty from here in the US>

Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:35 am

As far as I understand it bounty hunting is illegal full stop to even if some one was deemed deportable, it still wouldnt be legal for a bounty hunter to go capture him ?

And im against the law in its current state. I think the law should be there but needs certain adjustments to be made to it, before it is worth having. Otherwise your just saying criminals come here we will keep you safe.

Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:08 pm

We all know that some laws are stupid the way they are. And just because it’s the law doesn’t mean it's right. :bs:
In the other hand Bomzim has a point; he broke the law and there should be some kind of punishment.
So what are the takeaways?
• On my point of view the US police didn’t do the best of their abilities to get the bastard.
• The law agreements between countries may need to be reviewed to avoid guys like Dog to do this.
• Bomzim is a lawyer. :P :glasses5:

Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:55 pm

Nope not a lawyer and I'm hunting u the next time I catch you on server :idea:

And im against the law in its current state. I think the law should be there but needs certain adjustments to be made to it, before it is worth having. Otherwise your just saying criminals come here we will keep you safe.

It's Mexico that would have to change their law first off. Second Mexico loves denying entry into their country to go after criminals. Mostly because of the lucritive drug trade coming from that country , but then again that's why our country doesn't want to totally cut off the border.

It's all very complicated once you get to international dealings and you really have to look behind the scenes to see why things are the way they are.

None the less , Dog , went after a peice of crap criminal that I'm sure no one was really looking for all that hard . If our criminal justice system would have wanted him they would have had him if they set their minds to it . Don't be fooled by the fact that not bringing him in, means they couldn't if they wanted to , our police. He was no longer in their jurisdiction and was know someone elses problem . We don't have to pay rent on him once convicted and by leaving him their saves the taxpayer money , not to mention gets a criminal out of the US probably to never return.

Just like OSama , if we wanted him that bad we would have found him , instead we get sidetracked in Iraq , hunting Mr. Hussien. They found him hiding in the ground . Why , because they REALLy WAnted to find him . I just with they would put the same effort into finding osama ,but like I said maybe we should just sick the DOg on him .

Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:56 am

Yeah, maby if they did put their mind to it but just like the UK if they spent more money on national health and capturing criminals instead of going to war then maby our countries would be a safer place.

Letting him become some one elses problem isnt the answer to the problem. It just means more people will think they too can get away with it.

And dont get me even started on drugs lol

Thu Nov 02, 2006 7:11 pm

OO but thats what I'm trying to do here get u started.

It just means more people will think they too can get away with it.

OMG> I can see it now , the rapist thinking , hey I know I can go ahead and rape this person and goto mexico and i'll be fine.

PLZ< this is not how the criminal mind thinks. Laws are only a deterant to the people that choose to follow them , a criminal when doing anything criminal is NOT planning on getting caught . Thus changing the bounty hunting laws would have no affect . Changing the deportation laws would have no affect .

Mon Nov 06, 2006 4:55 am

I dont think thats totaly true whilst I understand what your saying about criminals not expecting to get caught, how many more bank robberys there would be if the maximum time you would spend in jail for doing it was only 2 years ???

Hehe ok they might not think exactly Ill run off to mexico after this quickie, but it was obviously some ones plan as dog went and got him !

And changing the bounty hunting law's / deportation laws obviously would have and effect because more ppl would be caught if it doesnt act as a deterant then at least you can still catch them and punish them for their crimes.

Mon Nov 06, 2006 6:48 pm

I dont think thats totaly true whilst I understand what your saying about criminals not expecting to get caught, how many more bank robberys there would be if the maximum time you would spend in jail for doing it was only 2 years ???

First it is true , criminals do not intend on getting caught when planning/doing a crime. My records still clean. :clown: and I've never planned on going to Mexico .

Did Dog plan on getting caught or doing time when he perpetrated his crime . I doubt it . But he got found out by the Mexican Authority's . NOw he should face his punishment. If the wouldn't of found out he would be in the clear . To bad he can't run to Mexico , maybe he'll head for Canada.

Second I never said decrease the punishment for a crime. So your point is against yourself. Besides our laws are so dinked on sentancing it's rediculous but thats a whole other discussion .