Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 8:25 pm
OK, correct me if I'm wrong, but this is what I have:
SVA
CAms
TRigga
Bean
Zeus
Wail
Snags
Zax
Karn
Kae
KK
ACY
Oblivion
12 total
DW
Toxic
Hornet
Namu
BigRed
Bomzin
Alpha
Bittr
Throd
Seaters
K
Maestro
And I am assuming Damnidge
12 Total
Looks like we are good to go. I was hoping for 16, but I guess that's pushing it.
OK, so here's the deal. If anyone would like to volunteer to go out to UT2004stats.epicgames.com and get everyone's efficiency in "Other" and post it here, that would be great. I took a quick look and unfortunately, we're going to have to fudge it a little. "Other" includes a lot of stuff and K for instance has a less that 50% efficiency in that category. But if he thinks I'm buying that for a second, he's wrong. So I think if we could post them all up, we can use it as a general guidline and argue from there.
From that, we can assign teams. Now with only 12 each, that means 6 teams. So what we can do is have each team play every other team once. The four teams with the best record can then have a playoff where each team plays each other once. The two teams with the best records play for the title. Does that sound good? If it's a little too drawn out, we could just have the two teams with the best records play after the initial round, and not have the interim round. LMK what everybody thinks.
Rich (TW)
SVA
CAms
TRigga
Bean
Zeus
Wail
Snags
Zax
Karn
Kae
KK
ACY
Oblivion
12 total
DW
Toxic
Hornet
Namu
BigRed
Bomzin
Alpha
Bittr
Throd
Seaters
K
Maestro
And I am assuming Damnidge
12 Total
Looks like we are good to go. I was hoping for 16, but I guess that's pushing it.
OK, so here's the deal. If anyone would like to volunteer to go out to UT2004stats.epicgames.com and get everyone's efficiency in "Other" and post it here, that would be great. I took a quick look and unfortunately, we're going to have to fudge it a little. "Other" includes a lot of stuff and K for instance has a less that 50% efficiency in that category. But if he thinks I'm buying that for a second, he's wrong. So I think if we could post them all up, we can use it as a general guidline and argue from there.
From that, we can assign teams. Now with only 12 each, that means 6 teams. So what we can do is have each team play every other team once. The four teams with the best record can then have a playoff where each team plays each other once. The two teams with the best records play for the title. Does that sound good? If it's a little too drawn out, we could just have the two teams with the best records play after the initial round, and not have the interim round. LMK what everybody thinks.
Rich (TW)